A Defence of Australian Education: To DFAIT and Ghur
Looking for an
international business research and teaching position where my training and
experience will make a positive impact on the organization policy needs and its
students. Your advertised opportunity was found by tracing your authorship of Best
Practices on Managing the Delivery of Canadian Education Marketing.
Daniel J. Costello 35 George Street, New Minas, Nova Scotia, B4N-4E2, Canada Tel: 1-902-681-0504 Skype: costello.daniel
Email: costello_daniel@yahoo.com
Email: costello_daniel@yahoo.com
January 27, 2013
Dr. Daniel J. Guhr San
Francisco Bay Area Office P.O.
Box 262 San Carlos, CA 94070 USA
Looking for an
international business research and teaching position where my training and
experience will make a positive impact on the organization policy needs and its
students. Your advertised opportunity was found by tracing your authorship of Best
Practices on Managing the Delivery of Canadian Education Marketing.
Allow me to submit a
brief review of your analysis regarding the Hollowed Out Quality of Australian Education
as perceived by your report and presented to the Department of Foreign Affairs
and Trade Canada and by extension the academic community in this nation which
consistently rejects the notion that there is anything to be learned or applied
in digging a little deeper in the dry.
Of mixed pedigree, a
Canadian applicant for your policy analyst position advertises the swag of a hollowed
out Australian graduate education. Even a rooster puffs itself up as big as it
can.
Yes, funding cuts made
more than forty years ago propelled the establishment of IDP and a federal
international marketing alignment was born out of necessity; the Canadian
government published their first policy paper on that topic just last year, or forty
years late. These are the same determining factors at present in Canada’s
educational internationalization scheme, consistent cutbacks and declining HDR
enrollments are familiar driving factors. Unless addressed, Canada may see a similar
threat in decline of GDP due to rising rates of research investment and
intensity in IP and new patents from other proportionally higher invested
research competitor OECD nations.
How Australia’s clear
blueprint to follow could be seen as a negative approach to financing and a
small tax base in population or as a poor solution for Australia, but a good
one for Canada is uncharitable. While realizing your report was published in
2009, Australia’s institutional research aims and accomplishments, despite
consistent cutbacks, are noteworthy for their growth in research
commercialization planning and clearer accountability measures even in the past
five years; similar transparency issues in taxpayer financed research in Canada
has yet to be addressed. The hollowed out quality foundation of which you write
is now measured and monitored by The Tertiary Education Quality and Standards
Agency (TEQSA) and while acrimonious in application and contentions, it is an
independent body as opposed to Canada’s own AUCC quality assessment of itself which
could be perceived as an effort to avoid the conflict of interest which that
reveals. Only one of Canada’s provinces is monitoring its higher education on
behalf of international students surely based on nefarious recruitment
campaigns which only harm Canada’s international educational brand.
The financial
difficulties of Australia’s institutions are apparent in the past four years,
amounting to the growth declines you presented however several racially
motivated attacks on foreign students carry some of the blow-back a rapid 71%
decline in Indian students enrollment following the murder of one of their
classmates in Sydney was an opportunity for Canada to pick up a concurrent
increase in Indian enrollments itself with a well-timed marketing campaign
which never took place. It is also
difficult to assume that declines in enrollments are based upon quality issues
when it is seen that the UK is facing similar declines due to tightened visa
requirements and the US is enjoying increased enrollments based upon price
cutting measures such as delivering university programming through high school extension
services.
Yet, Australia’s firm
footholds in Asia are based upon forty years of relationship building; the
success of these markets provide tangible and positive social capital impacts
upon the growth in business and IT research and evidence of the quality of
education delivered. Progressive steps to offshore branch campus developments
in several of those nations somewhat anticipates future declines in international
enrollments in Australia. The growth in local competitors abroad which
Australia largely helped to train and teach will squeeze resources at home in
the estimated 30% declines in domestic student enrollments predicted not only
for Australia but Canada as well over the next decade; a commitment to doubling
of international students in Canada by 2022 according to a recent DFAIT report
on commercialization will hardly meet domestic enrollment declines. In short,
it appears to me that Australia has utilized its scant resources to the best of
its capacity while Canada’s institutions have yet to do so and have displayed
an elegant example of agency theory without greater revelation of forever
missed past and future opportunities to support research which maintains and
ensures Canada’s quality of life.
Relocation ready; available
immediately.
Sincerely,
Dan Costello
No comments:
Post a Comment