tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19089383.post812513708197167185..comments2023-10-19T22:58:23.663+09:00Comments on Cross-Cultural Reviews: Ship's Rail Liabilities Under FOB ClauseDaniel Costellohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00666102412079717778noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19089383.post-42958738043127908062009-11-04T18:45:15.230+09:002009-11-04T18:45:15.230+09:00This ships rail swaying issue is the point of Zell...This ships rail swaying issue is the point of Zeller's reference to FCA as a safer option. <br /><br />I am sure Countryman & McDaniels spend a lot of time and litigants' legal budgets on such difficult swaying cases. <br /><br />Cheers! <br />DanDaniel Costellohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00666102412079717778noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19089383.post-88139967221023614242009-11-04T08:24:54.790+09:002009-11-04T08:24:54.790+09:00FOB as defined in Incoterms 2000 does not requre t...FOB as defined in Incoterms 2000 does not requre the goods to be loaded - only that they pass the ship's rail. In the case of swaying back over the rail to the dock side, wouldn't there be a good argument that it is the buyer's loss? Of course, there would have to be indisputable evidence that this in fact happened.Roy Beckerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17539384826449387605noreply@blogger.com